Killer Acquisitions

Download File
WP-Killer Acquisitions-Cunningham-Ederer-Ma
Authors:

Colleen Cunningham, London Business School
Florian Ederer, Yale University
Song Ma, Yale University


Abstract:

This paper argues incumbent firms may acquire innovative targets solely to discontinue the target’s innovation projects and preempt future competition. We call such acquisitions “killer acquisitions.” We develop a parsimonious model illustrating this phenomenon. Using pharmaceutical industry data, we show that acquired drug projects are less likely to be developed when they overlap with the acquirer’s existing product portfolio, especially when the acquirer’s market power is large due to weak competition or distant patent expiration. Conservative estimates indicate about 6% of acquisitions in our sample are killer acquisitions. These acquisitions disproportionately occur just below thresholds for antitrust scrutiny.

April 16, 2019

AUTHORS:

Colleen Cunningham Florian Ederer Song Ma

Topics

Anticompetitive Conduct

Related

post

U.S. Congress begins to restore competition to the drug industry

Competition
working paper

Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation

CompetitionInequality & Mobility
post

Competition’s role in controlling prescription drug prices

Competition
post

Market power in the U.S. economy today

Competition
Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge: Structural presumption in U.S. merger control policy would strengthen modern antitrust enforcement

Competition
Past Event

Building a New Consensus on Antitrust Reform

Competition
Connect with us!

Explore the Equitable Growth network of experts around the country and get answers to today's most pressing questions!

Get in Touch