Liquidity vs. wealth in household debt obligations: Evidence from housing policy in the Great Recession

Download File
0918-Ganong-Noel-WP
Authors:

Peter Ganong, University of Chicago
Pascal Noel, Harvard University


Abstract:

We use variation in mortgage modifications to disentangle the impact of reducing long-term obligations with no change in short-term payments (“wealth”), and reducing short-term payments with approximately no change in long-term obligations (“liquidity”). Using regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences research designs with administrative data measuring default and consumption, we find that principal reductions that increase housing wealth without affecting liquidity have no effect, while maturity extensions that increase only liquidity have large effects. Our results suggest that liquidity drives borrower default and consumption decisions, and that distressed debt restructurings can be redesigned with substantial gains to borrowers, lenders, and taxpayers.

September 4, 2018

Topics

Credit & Debt

Related

post

Unemployment and models of U.S. consumption

Labor
working paper

Consumer spending during unemployment: Positive and normative implications

Labor
grant

Can reforms to public and private credit provisions bolster social insurance and promote more equitable growth?

Tax & MacroeconomicsInequality & Mobility
post

How inequalities of wealth matter for consumption

Inequality & MobilityTax & Macroeconomics
post

What new administrative data reveals about access to consumer credit and the U.S. economy

Tax & MacroeconomicsLabor
post

Giving credit to the unemployed

Tax & MacroeconomicsLabor
Connect with us!

Explore the Equitable Growth network of experts around the country and get answers to today's most pressing questions!

Get in Touch