Tag: John Cochrane

Must-Read: Dietrich Vollrath: Can We Get Rich by “Doing Business” Better?

Posted on by Brad DeLong

Must-Read: Dietrich Vollrath: Can We Get Rich by “Doing Business” Better?: “Below I’m going to get to the gory details of why the Doing Business (DB) indicators generally suck…

…But let me start with this note. The DB index [John] Cochrane uses is a ‘distance to the frontier’ index. Meaning you get a number that tells you how close to best practices in business conditions a country gets. If you are at the best practices in all categories, you’d get a 100. Cochrane says, and I quote, ‘If America could improve on the best seen in other countries by 10%, a 110 score would generate $400,000 income per capita…’. Stew on that for a moment. Think about how that DB frontier index is constructed.

Cochrane went there. He said it could go to 11….

[…]

It Gets Worse: In the follow up post, Cochrane appeals to a graph from my textbook with Chad Jones… the relationship of an index of ‘social infrastructure’ and TFP…. I calculated it, graphed it, and stuck it on the slide that Cochrane linked to. I simply scaled and averaged the 6 different components of the World Bank’s governance indicators, much like the DB index. It has all the issues I described above, except worse. This figure tells us very little. Which is why in the book we immediately say that you cannot infer anything causal from it, and then go on to talk about some of the better studies done looking at specific institutions and their effects on economic outcomes…

Can we get rich by Doing Business better Dietrich Vollrath

Must-read: George W. Evans and Bruce McGough: Interest Rate Pegs in New Keynesian Models

Posted on by Brad DeLong

Must-Read: Barrel. Fish. Gun:

George W. Evans and Bruce McGough: Interest Rate Pegs in New Keynesian Models: “John Cochrane asks: Do higher interest rates raise or lower inflation?’…

…We find that pegging the interest rate at a higher level will induce instability and most likely lead to falling inflation and output over time. Eventually, this will precipitate a change of policy…

Must-read: Noah Smith: “Brad DeLong Pulpifies a Cochrane Graph”

Posted on by Brad DeLong

Must-Read: Very welcome backup from the very-sharp and extremely hard-working newly ex-academic Noah Smith. I very much hope his new career path is very successful: it deserves to be…

Noah Smith: Brad DeLong Pulpifies a Cochrane Graph: “I’ve always been highly skeptical of John Cochrane’s claim that if we simply launched a massive deregulatory effort…

…it would make us many times richer than we are today. Cochrane typically shows a graph of the World Bank’s ‘ease of doing business’ rankings vs. GDP, and claims that… if we boost our World Bank ranking slightly past the (totally hypothetical) ‘frontier’, we can make our country five times as rich as it currently is…. Brad DeLong, however, has done me one better. In a short yet magisterial blog post, DeLong shows that even if Cochrane is right that countries can move freely around the World Bank ranking graph, the policy conclusions are incredibly sensitive to the choice of functional form….

DeLong… decides to do his own curve-fitting exercise. Instead of a linear model for log GDP, he fits a quadratic polynomial, a cubic polynomial, and a quartic polynomial…. Cochrane’s conclusion disappears entirely! As soon as you add even a little curvature to the function, the data tell us that the U.S. is actually at or very near the optimal policy frontier. DeLong also posts his R code in case you want to play with it yourself. This is a dramatic pulpification of a type rarely seen these days. (And Greg Mankiw gets caught in the blast wave.)…

You’d think Cochrane would care about this possibility enough to at least play around with slightly different functional forms before declaring in the Wall Street Journal that we can boost our per capita income to $400,000 per person by launching an all-out attack on the regulatory state. I mean, how much effort does it take? Not much. And this is an important issue. An all-out attack on the regulatory state would inevitably destroy many regulations that have a net social benefit. The cost would be high. Economists shouldn’t bend over backwards to try to show that the benefits would be even higher. That’s just not good policy advice.

NewImage
NewImage

NewImage

Play with the R-code if you want to see how much a more flexible functional form wants to say that the U.S. has the optimal “Business Climate”: http://tinyurl.com/dl20160505c. I.e.:

NewImage
NewImage
NewImage