Grant Category

Macroeconomics and Inequality

What are the implications of inequality on the long-term stability of our economy and its growth potential?

What are the implications of inequality on the long-term stability of our economy and its growth potential?

A larger share of U.S. national income has been flowing to the individuals at the top of the income and wealth ladder. These individuals are less likely to spend and more likely to save their money than those with lower income. There is evidence that growing income inequality may be contributing to the so-called secular stagnation of macroeconomic growth.

Growing income inequality likely bears on macroeconomic performance through other channels as well. The lower real interest rates that have resulted from higher global saving will limit the ability of conventional monetary policy to stabilize the economy in the next economic downturn. Growing inequality has also contributed to a growing sense that the economy isn’t working for most families, fueling both distrust in institutions and greater political polarization.

We need to better understand the implications of inequality on the long-term stability of our economy and its growth potential. The large and sustained rise in inequality across income and wealth groups, as well as the disparate performance of different geographies and demographic groups, make understanding how these trends could exacerbate economic instability and reduce economic growth a pressing national concern.

  • The effects of monetary policy
  • The effects of fiscal policy
  • The effects of the tax and transfer system
  • Political economy

Explore the Grants We've Awarded

Reset

How does capital investment affect workers? Evidence from bonus depreciation and matched employer-employee data

Grant Year: 2019

Grant Amount: $55,000

Grant Type: academic

The extent to which capital and labor are substitutes and how this substitutability shapes worker outcomes is a key determinant of economic inequality. This project proposes to study the effect of bonus depreciation on worker outcomes using employer-employee matched Census data in order to understand whether capital investments in the form of new technologies are replacing workers and whether the impact is different for workers of various skill levels.

Market design responses to inequality

Grant Year: 2019

Grant Amount: $29,400

Grant Type: academic

Much of the theory of market design operates in two extreme environments: One where monetary transfers are prohibited, and one where there are transfers but each individual values one dollar in the same way. This research seeks to understand how to optimally design goods markets in the presence of wealth inequality and is conducted across three discrete research papers. The first project develops an analytic framework for a middle ground where agents are wealth constrained or have income effects. The second project develops a continuous-time model of dynamic capital taxation, and the third project considers dynamic effects of inequality using formal models.

Workers in the board room: The causal effects of shared governance

Grant Year: 2019

Grant Amount: $55,000

Grant Type: academic

Whether and how to involve workers in decision-making at the workplace is a fundamental question of the organization of firms and economies more broadly. This project proposes to use a novel research design to study a 1994 reform in Germany that sharply abolished employee board representation in newly incorporated firms with fewer than 500 workers in order to analyze the effects of shared governance on a variety of firm and worker-level outcomes, including wages, distribution of profits, and inequality of pay within a firm. The authors will use a regression discontinuity design that exploits the 1994 reform, supplemented with a difference-in-difference approach that compares changes among shareholder firms to changes among nonshareholder firms that were never subject to co-determination and thus were not affected by the reform. This will allow them to control for general economic trends that may have impacted firm and worker outcomes around the timing of the reform.

The Matching Multiplier and the Amplification of Recessions: Evidence from the LEHD

Grant Year: 2018

Grant Type: dissertation scholar

How does the differential exposure of workers to recessions contribute to the overall size of the recession? Does this heterogeneity in exposure to aggregate shocks occur within or between firms, and what does this mean for the effectiveness of various stabilization policies (Unemployment Insurance or Monetary Policy)?

Tax evasion by the wealthy: Measurement and implications

Grant Year: 2018

Grant Amount: $68,422

Grant Type: academic

Measuring inequality is critical to understanding the nature of the challenge and its effects. This project aims to improve measurement of wealth inequality by understanding the extent to which tax evasion by the wealthy affects inequality measurements that rely on tax records. The authors combine administrative data on tax compliance, including audit results and the results of voluntary disclosure programs, and data leaked from financial and legal entities in recent years to explore the prevalence and scope of tax evasion by the wealthy. The researchers will use the improved estimates of tax evasion by the wealthy to construct revised estimates of income and wealth inequality in the United States.

Consumer protection law and mortgage markets

Grant Year: 2018

Grant Amount: $15,000

Grant Type: doctoral

This three-part project will empirically investigate the role of consumer protection laws on U.S. mortgage market outcomes and consumer welfare. Homeownership represents an important source of wealth for American families and is a primary source of wealth transfer across generations. But the housing crisis during the Great Recession disproportionately affected minorities and households at the lower end of the wealth distribution, precipitating calls for regulatory reform in mortgage markets to preserve the financial health of American households. Little evidence currently exists about the effect of particular legal regimes on the operation of the mortgage market. Specifically, this project asks whether laws providing new grounds for consumer or public enforcer lawsuits against mortgage providers can successfully improve consumer outcomes. Padi proposes to answer this question by looking at the effects of legislation and regulations passed in the states and assessing their impact by comparing results to those in neighboring states.

Experts

Grantee

Jessica H. Brown

University of South Carolina

Learn More
Grantee

Jhacova Williams

American University

Learn More
Grantee

Ezra Oberfield

Princeton University

Learn More
Grantee

Derek Wu

University of Chicago

Learn More
Grantee

Derek Lemoine

University of Arizona

Learn More