Things to Read at Lunchtime on October 13, 2014

Must- and Shall-Reads:

 

  1. NASA Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record ThinkProgressJoe Romm: NASA: Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record: “Last month was the warmest September globally since records began being kept in 1880, NASA reported Sunday. January through September data have 2014 already at the third warmest on record. Projections by NOAA make clear 2014 is taking aim at hottest year on record. Remarkably, this September record occurred even though we’re still waiting for the start of El Niño, which reveals just how strong the underlying trend of human-caused warming is. It’s usually the combination of the long-term manmade warming trend and the regional El Niño warming pattern that leads to new global temperature records. In this country, temperatures were quite hot in the West, and just ‘normal’ or very close to the 1951-1980 average in the East, as this NASA chart shows…”NASA Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record ThinkProgress
  2. Annie Lowrey: Amazon Is Not a Monopoly: “Franklin Foer… arguing that Amazon is a monopoly…. There’s just one problem…. Amazon is not a monopoly…. Foer waives this competitive pressure away…. Businesses compete. Very often the bigger one wins. Foer argues, however, that Amazon’s ‘big-footing necessitates a government response,’ without really explaining why…. He describes us all as complicit in… something. I’m not sure what: ‘We’ve all been seduced by the deep discounts, the monthly automatic diaper delivery, the free Prime movies, the gift wrapping, the free two-day shipping, the ability to buy shoes or books or pinto beans or a toilet all from the same place,’ he writes. ‘But it has gone beyond seduction, really. We expect these kinds of conveniences now, as if they were birthrights.’ Is that really such a bad thing? Amazon relentlessly drives down prices for goods and services and delivers them fast and cheap…. None of this is to say that Amazon should not face new regulations to force it to treat its workers better…. None of this is to say that its harassment of Hachette is right or should be legal or should not face some serious pushback…. But Amazon being a shitty, vicious competitor and Amazon being a monopoly are hardly the same thing.”

  3. Paul Krugman: How Righteousness Killed the World Economy – NYTimes.com: “Revenge of the Unforgiven: Historically, the solution to high levels of debt has often involved writing off and forgiving much of that debt. Sometimes this happens explicitly: In the 1930s F.D.R. helped borrowers refinance with much cheaper mortgages, while in this crisis Iceland is outright canceling a significant part of the debt households ran up…. More often, debt relief takes place implicitly, through ‘financial repression’: government policies hold interest rates down, while inflation erodes the real value of debt. What’s striking about the past few years, however, is how little debt relief has actually taken place…. In major economies, very few debtors have received a break. And far from being inflated away, the burden of debt has been aggravated by falling inflation, which is running well below target in America and near zero in Europe…. But it has been very hard to get either the policy elite or the public to understand that sometimes debt relief is in everyone’s interest. Instead, the response to poor economic performance has essentially been that the beatings will continue until morale improves. Maybe, just maybe, bad news–say, a recession in Germany–will finally bring an end to this destructive reign of virtue. But don’t count on it.”

  4. Michael Graziano: Are We Really Conscious?: I believe… we don’t actually have inner feelings in the way most of us think we do…. The brain builds models… and those models are often not accurate…. How does the brain go beyond processing information to become subjectively aware of information? The answer is: It doesn’t…. When we introspect and seem to find… awareness, consciousness, the way green looks or pain feels… those models are providing information that is wrong…. You might object that this is a paradox. If awareness is an erroneous impression, isn’t it still an impression? And isn’t an impression a form of awareness?… Attention: a real, mechanistic phenomenon that can be programmed into a computer chip. Awareness: a cartoonish reconstruction of attention that is as physically inaccurate as the brain’s internal model of color…. Like the intuition that white light is pure, our intuitions about awareness come from information computed deep in the brain. But the brain computes models that are caricatures of real things. And as with color, so with consciousness: It’s best to be skeptical…

  5. Wolfgang Münchau: Germany’s Weak Point Is Its Reliance on Exports: “What is the reason for Germany’s weakness?… The root cause of the problem is the age-old over-reliance on exports–and on plant and machinery exports in particular…. There are no signs of a strong global recovery, let alone of a global investment boom. It is thus reasonable to expect a mediocre performance by the German economy for a while…. On top of that comes a demographic shock…. Now both the core and the periphery are weak. And policy is not responding sufficiently. Add the two together and it is not hard to conclude that secular stagnation is not so much a danger as the most probable scenario.”

Should Be Aware of:

 

  1. Dani Rodrik: Are Services the New Manufactures?:: “Few serious analysts still believe that the spectacular economic convergence experienced by Asian countries, and less spectacularly by most Latin American and African countries, will be sustained…. Developing countries need a new growth model. The problem is not just that they need to wean themselves from their reliance on fickle capital inflows and commodity booms, which have often left them vulnerable to shocks and prone to crises. More important, export-oriented industrialization, history’s most certain path to riches, may have run its course…. While global supply chains have facilitated entry into manufacturing, they have also reduced the gains in terms of value added that accrue at home…. Can service industries play the role that manufacturing did in the past?… In manufacturing, small developing countries could thrive on the basis of a few export successes and diversify sequentially through time–t-shirts now, followed by the assembly of televisions and microwave ovens, and on up the chain of skill and value.
    By contrast, in services, where market size is limited by domestic demand, continued success requires complementary and simultaneous gains in productivity in the rest of the economy…. So I remain skeptical that a services-led model can deliver rapid growth and good jobs in the way that manufacturing once did…”

  2. John Scalzi: My Annual Plug and Appreciation for WordPress VIP: “I was traveling on October 8, the official anniversary date, but today works just as well for this: Hey, I’ve been using WordPress’ VIP service to host Whatever for six years now, and it has been consistently great during all that time: The site never goes down, never buckles under traffic or spikes, and on the very rare occasions when I do have a concern or issue, it’s addressed quickly, efficiently and by people who are awesome and easy to work with. Which is to say WordPress VIP takes the aggravation out of having a site and allows me to focus here on what I do best, which is write. As I do every year, I unreservedly recommend WordPress VIP for folks hoping to run their sites with minimum possible levels of aggravation. It is the best hosting solution I’ve ever had. Likewise, for those folks who just want a corner of the Web to call their own, I can also recommend the standard WordPress offerings. And, also once again, thanks to the people at WordPress VIP who have helped Whatever be a rock solid presence on the Web for the last six years. You folks are the best.”

Morning Must-Read: Wolfgang Münchau: Germany’s Weak Point Is Its Reliance on Exports

Wolfgang Münchau: Germany’s Weak Point Is Its Reliance on Exports: “What is the reason for Germany’s weakness?…

…The root cause of the problem is the age-old over-reliance on exports–and on plant and machinery exports in particular…. There are no signs of a strong global recovery, let alone of a global investment boom. It is thus reasonable to expect a mediocre performance by the German economy for a while…. On top of that comes a demographic shock…. Now both the core and the periphery are weak. And policy is not responding sufficiently. Add the two together and it is not hard to conclude that secular stagnation is not so much a danger as the most probable scenario.

Mario Draghi has a plan for the Eurozone–an inadequate plan, an optimism-of-the-will plan (at best), but a plan. What do his policy adversaries have? The hope that somehow a strong U.S. recovery and rising U.S. interest rates will produce a falling euro and thus a renewed European export boom, and the hope that they will somehow find a way to use the debt capacity of northern Europe to induce a northern European privately-funded infrastructure boom.

Hope is not a plan.

Morning Must-Read: Joe Romm: NASA: Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record

NASA Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record ThinkProgress

Joe Romm: NASA: Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record: “Last month was the warmest September globally…

…since records began being kept in 1880, NASA reported Sunday. January through September data have 2014 already at the third warmest on record. Projections by NOAA make clear 2014 is taking aim at hottest year on record. Remarkably, this September record occurred even though we’re still waiting for the start of El Niño, which reveals just how strong the underlying trend of human-caused warming is. It’s usually the combination of the long-term manmade warming trend and the regional El Niño warming pattern that leads to new global temperature records. In this country, temperatures were quite hot in the West, and just ‘normal’ or very close to the 1951-1980 average in the East, as this NASA chart shows…”

NASA Hottest September On Record Globally Pushes 2014 Closer To Hottest Year On Record ThinkProgress

It is not at all clear to me, however, whether this is going to be an El Nino year. I am told that the odds are only two in three. And the forecast errors over the past six months have all been in the “less El Nino than expected” direction…

Morning Must-Read: Annie Lowrey: Amazon Is Not a Monopoly

Annie Lowrey: Amazon Is Not a Monopoly: “Franklin Foer… arguing that Amazon is a monopoly….

…There’s just one problem…. Amazon is not a monopoly…. Foer waives this competitive pressure away…. Businesses compete. Very often the bigger one wins. Foer argues, however, that Amazon’s ‘big-footing necessitates a government response,’ without really explaining why…. He describes us all as complicit in… something. I’m not sure what: ‘We’ve all been seduced by the deep discounts, the monthly automatic diaper delivery, the free Prime movies, the gift wrapping, the free two-day shipping, the ability to buy shoes or books or pinto beans or a toilet all from the same place,’ he writes. ‘But it has gone beyond seduction, really. We expect these kinds of conveniences now, as if they were birthrights.’ Is that really such a bad thing? Amazon relentlessly drives down prices for goods and services and delivers them fast and cheap…. None of this is to say that Amazon should not face new regulations to force it to treat its workers better…. None of this is to say that its harassment of Hachette is right or should be legal or should not face some serious pushback…. But Amazon being a shitty, vicious competitor and Amazon being a monopoly are hardly the same thing.

Annie is, of course, correct. My view:

  1. to protect their hardcover markets by reducing the utility of ebooks by imposing onerous DRM on them;
  2. thinking that even though this then handed a near-monopoly over ebooks to kindle because of first-mover and lock-in effects;
  3. Amazon would then share its monopoly ebook profits with them;
  4. and when the big publishers found out this was not true, they persuaded Apple to help them organize a cartel to try to force Amazon to share some of the ebook monopoly profits;
  5. at which point the Justice Department slapped them down.

If the big publishers wanted to break Amazon’s ebook monopoly tomorrow they could by simply issuing DRM-free ebooks to anyone who had a kindle file. But they really, really do not want to do this. If Hachette does not like the way that Amazon is negotiating with it about the terms under which it can get its books on Kindles, Hachette can solve this problem tomorrow by selling kindle ebooks to kindle owners directly and so bypass Amazon.

The big publishers are a technologically-regressive cartel that collectively have a near-monopoly of print books; Amazon is a technologically-progressive monopoly wannabe of ebooks. Amazon’s wannabe monopoly status was created by and is dependent on the unwillingness of the big publishers to do anything that might accelerate the decline of their hardcover market. That does not seem to me to create on obvious case for the government to put its thumb on the scales on the publishers’ side.

Morning Must-Read: Paul Krugman: How Righteousness Killed the World Economy

Paul Krugman: How Righteousness Killed the World Economy: “Revenge of the Unforgiven…

…Historically, the solution to high levels of debt has often involved writing off and forgiving much of that debt. Sometimes this happens explicitly: In the 1930s F.D.R. helped borrowers refinance with much cheaper mortgages, while in this crisis Iceland is outright canceling a significant part of the debt households ran up…. More often, debt relief takes place implicitly, through ‘financial repression’: government policies hold interest rates down, while inflation erodes the real value of debt. What’s striking about the past few years, however, is how little debt relief has actually taken place…. In major economies, very few debtors have received a break. And far from being inflated away, the burden of debt has been aggravated by falling inflation, which is running well below target in America and near zero in Europe…. But it has been very hard to get either the policy elite or the public to understand that sometimes debt relief is in everyone’s interest. Instead, the response to poor economic performance has essentially been that the beatings will continue until morale improves. Maybe, just maybe, bad news–say, a recession in Germany–will finally bring an end to this destructive reign of virtue. But don’t count on it.

I would simply note that it was and is a very selective “righteousness”.

Bankers got bailed out of their bad loans and got lots of low-interest financial support when they needed it. And with only a few exceptions the senior bankers who were supposed to oversee the system that generated the systemic risk in the crisis did not lose their jobs. Moreover, they did not lose their chips in the game of political bank regulation either.

GM and Chrysler got lots of low-interest financial support when they needed it. But their executive hierarchy got decapitated and their unions took a substantial hit in their pensions.

Homeowners got absolutely nothing–no effective programs to provide large-scale refis either with or without equity kickers attached.

Morning Must-Read: Michael Graziano vs. Rene Descartes

Michael Graziano: Are We Really Conscious?: I believe… we don’t actually have inner feelings…

in the way most of us think we do…. The brain builds models… and those models are often not accurate…. How does the brain go beyond processing information to become subjectively aware of information? The answer is: It doesn’t…. When we introspect and seem to find… awareness, consciousness, the way green looks or pain feels… those models are providing information that is wrong…. You might object that this is a paradox. If awareness is an erroneous impression, isn’t it still an impression? And isn’t an impression a form of awareness?… Attention: a real, mechanistic phenomenon that can be programmed into a computer chip. Awareness: a cartoonish reconstruction of attention that is as physically inaccurate as the brain’s internal model of color…. Like the intuition that white light is pure, our intuitions about awareness come from information computed deep in the brain. But the brain computes models that are caricatures of real things. And as with color, so with consciousness: It’s best to be skeptical…

I score Descartes versus Graziano like this: Descartes 6-0 6-0 6-0.

That there is no single energy transition that produces a photon of white light does not mean that WhiteLight is not a thing. That subjective awareness is the mind’s approximate and subjective model of its attention processes, and that subjective awareness of one’s subjective self is the mind’s approximate and subjective model of what happens when it tries to focus its attention on itself does not mean that “consciousness” is not a thing.

Things to Read on the Morning of October 12, 2014

Must- and Shall-Reads:

 

  1. Heather Boushey and Carter Price: How Are Economic Inequality and Growth Connected?: A Review: “Ostry, Berg, and their IMF colleague Charalambos Tsangarides include an analysis of the impacts of redistribution, as well as market inequality. They find that economic growth is lower and periods of growth are shorter in countries that have high inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient of income after taxes and transfers.43 In the same paper, the researchers show that transfers (redistributions of income from upper to lower income individuals) do not harm economic growth—at least up to a point consistent with policies in other wealthy nations. This most recent work provides strong evidence that higher levels of income inequality are detrimental to long-term economic growth and that the policies some nations have taken to redress inequality not only do not adversely impact growth but, instead, spur faster growth. Notably, this finding applies to both developed and developing countries…”

  2. Paul Krugman: Europanic 2.0 – NYTimes.com “Anyone who works in international monetary economics is familiar with Dornbusch’s Law: ‘The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.’ And so it is with the latest euro crisis… the euro area as a whole, which is sliding into a deflationary trap with the ECB already essentially at the zero lower bound. Draghi can try to get traction through quantitative easing, but it’s by no means clear that this could do the trick… and… he faces severe political constraints…. What strikes me, also, is the extent of intellectual confusion that remains. Germany still seems determined to regard the whole thing as the wages of fiscal irresponsibility, which not only rules out effective fiscal stimulus but hobbles QE, since it’s anathema for them to consider buying government debt. And it’s remarkable, too, how the logic of the liquidity trap remains elusive even after six years–six years!–at the zero lower bound. Not the worst example, but I read Reza Moghadam…. Augh! If it’s external competitiveness you’re worried about, depreciating the euro is what you want, not wage cuts. And cutting wages in a liquidity-trap economy almost surely deepens the slump. How can this not be part of what everyone understands by now? Europe has surprised many people, myself included, with its resilience. And I do think the Draghi-era ECB has become a major source of strength. But I (and others I talk to) are having an ever harder time seeing how this ends… non-catastrophically…. What’s your scenario?”

  3. Dean Baker: David Leonhardt Wonders Why Its Cold In the Winter and Wages Aren’t Rising: “The economy is still way below potential GDP…. The employment to population ratio is still close to 4.0 percentage points below its pre-recession level. Even if we restrict the question to prime age workers… to eliminate the issue of retirement, the drop is still 3.0 percentage points. The share of the workforce involuntarily working part-time is still more than 50 percent above its pre-recession level…. There is still a large amount of slack in the labor market…. With the answer right in front of him, like the French colonel in Casablanca, Leonhardt rushes to round up the usual suspects…. Unfortunately, the data refuse to cooperate…. The wages for recent college grads has fallen sharply since 2000…. The obvious issue is that we need more demand in the economy. That can be most easily accomplished with more government spending…”

  4. Pedro Nicolaci da Costa: Fed Can’t Keep Falling Short of Inflation Goal, Says Evans: “The Federal Reserve can afford to keep interest rates at zero at least until inflation rises to its 2% target, which will probably not happen in the next two years, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said Saturday…. He said the central bank shouldn’t raise interest rates until early 2016 since much ground needs to be made up on inflation and employment…. Mr. Evans says he sees the U.S. economy, which has been stumbling along at an annual rate of growth of around 2% since the start of the recovery from the recession, picking up to a pace closer to 3%… unemployment remains elevated and inflation is still well below the central bank’s official 2% target… the Fed should be symmetric about hitting its inflation target, and that staying below it for a prolonged period was equally problematic as hovering above it… sees inflation staying below the Fed’s 2% objective ‘well past 2017’. That view underpins his position, one of the most aggressive at the central bank…”

  5. Steve Randy Waldmann: Scale, progressivity, and socioeconomic cohesion: “US taxation may not be as progressive as it appears because of sales and payroll taxes, but European social democracies have payroll taxes too, and very large, probably regressive VATs…. Universal taxation for universal benefits seems to work a lot better at building cohesive societies than taxes targeted at the rich that finance transfers to the poor, because universality engenders political support and therefore scale. And it is scale that matters most of all…. How can a regressively financed program making regressive payouts reduce inequality? Easily, because no (overt) public sector program would ever offer net payouts as phenomenally, ridiculously concentrated as so-called ‘market income’…”

Should Be Aware of:

 

  1. Kevin O’Rourke: Sinking, fast and slow: “For well over a year now some of us have been pointing out that the Eurozone crisis was entering a very dangerous phase, in which slowly increasing unemployment would eat away at the foundations of Europe’s societies, while short-sighted politicians and excitable journalists proclaimed that the Euro was saved…. I find myself worrying most about France. Twiddling their thumbs and hoping that something (the economy) will turn up, flawed macroeconomic policy notwithstanding, seems to have been the French government’s master plan up till now…. You may think that Paul Krugman is being too alarmist when he raises the possibility of President Le Pen, and I hope you are right. But Sarkozy’s apparent return to the political fray does worry me. Of course, you may think that if he wins the UMP nomination, the Left will rally round and vote for him when it comes to the second round. How confident are you about that?”

  2. Barkley Rosser: The Washington Post’s Fred Hiatt Hysterical Over Losing His Schtick: “For years, this Editor of the Editorial page of the Washington Post has made his named appearances on the editorial page (he daily bloviates the main ed lead anonymously) only to call for cutting Social Security, and occasionally Medicare as well… [also] R.J. Samuelson, Ruth Marcus, and even more recently, Catherine Rampell. I almost wrote on this when he went nuts over this on Monday, but Dean Baker whonked on him pretty solidly immediately, pointing out how stupid and ridiculous he looked, declaring that while today’s US debt/GDP ratio is 74%, with near zero interest rates, ten years from now the CBO says it will be 78%, which Hiatt hysterically declared to be ‘dangerous’…. The ridicule has mounted, some of it more general, some of it more specific…. John Podesta, whom he cited in his Monday WaPo piece, perhaps the single most stupid and embarassing column he has ever written, has dumped all over him in on Twitter with an accompanying column…. So, let me add my two bits to this that none of the above have yet said. First of all, it is amazing that when confronted with good news from the CBO that medical care costs are falling, leading to declining future deficit projections, Hiatt does not applaud, indeed, does not anywhere in his column even note that this is a change…. So, I feel sorry for Fred. Beating up on seniors who have paid in their taxes for what they are getting has been the one an only topic that has inspired him to write columns under his own name for many years. The new projections of lower deficits, good news to most of us, simply do not register with him…”

  3. Matthew Yglesias: The real problem with Nate Silver’s model is the hazy metaphysics of probability: “The most interesting subplot of 2012 US election coverage was the battle between the poll-oriented quants–most famously Nate Silver–and sundry television know-nothing pundits who insisted based on their guts that Mitt Romney was going to pull it out. The 2014 horserace has produced… a proliferation of quantitative models based on poll aggregation… [and] its own entertaining feud between the famous, entertaining, and media-savvy Nate Silver and the less-known Princeton University scientist Sam Wang…. We’re never going to know which model is correct…. If we got to look at 100 or a 1,000 midterm elections, we’d end up with a pretty good sense of whether Silver’s forecast or Wang’s forecast is the more accurate one. But elections simply don’t happen that frequently…. Which isn’t to say we should go back to the bullshitting-on-television approach to understanding elections. Rather, we should try to remember the high-level points that all these models have in common, namely “the candidate leading in the polls usually wins” and “aggregating polls is more accurate than looking at particular ones.” Unlike fussing over the details of 51 percent vs 57 percent, these are actionable insights…. Smart people are really good at devising sophisticated explanations for why their preferred outcome is also the likely one…”

Morning Must-Read: Dean Baker: David Leonhardt Wonders Why Its Cold In the Winter and Wages Aren’t Rising

Dean Baker: David Leonhardt Wonders Why Its Cold In the Winter and Wages Aren’t Rising: “The economy is still way below potential GDP….

…The employment to population ratio is still close to 4.0 percentage points below its pre-recession level. Even if we restrict the question to prime age workers… to eliminate the issue of retirement, the drop is still 3.0 percentage points. The share of the workforce involuntarily working part-time is still more than 50 percent above its pre-recession level…. There is still a large amount of slack in the labor market…. With the answer right in front of him, like the French colonel in Casablanca, Leonhardt rushes to round up the usual suspects…. Unfortunately, the data refuse to cooperate…. The wages for recent college grads has fallen sharply since 2000…. The obvious issue is that we need more demand in the economy. That can be most easily accomplished with more government spending…

Morning Must-Read: Paul Krugman: Europanic 2.0

…is familiar with Dornbusch’s Law: ‘The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.’ And so it is with the latest euro crisis… the euro area as a whole, which is sliding into a deflationary trap with the ECB already essentially at the zero lower bound. Draghi can try to get traction through quantitative easing, but it’s by no means clear that this could do the trick… and… he faces severe political constraints…. What strikes me, also, is the extent of intellectual confusion that remains. Germany still seems determined to regard the whole thing as the wages of fiscal irresponsibility, which not only rules out effective fiscal stimulus but hobbles QE, since it’s anathema for them to consider buying government debt. And it’s remarkable, too, how the logic of the liquidity trap remains elusive even after six years–six years!–at the zero lower bound. Not the worst example, but I read Reza Moghadam…. Augh! If it’s external competitiveness you’re worried about, depreciating the euro is what you want, not wage cuts. And cutting wages in a liquidity-trap economy almost surely deepens the slump. How can this not be part of what everyone understands by now? Europe has surprised many people, myself included, with its resilience. And I do think the Draghi-era ECB has become a major source of strength. But I (and others I talk to) are having an ever harder time seeing how this ends… non-catastrophically…. What’s your scenario?

Morning Must-Read: Heather Boushey and Carter Price: How Are Economic Inequality and Growth Connected?: A Review

Heather Boushey and Carter Price: How Are Economic Inequality and Growth Connected?: A Review: “Ostry, Berg, and their IMF colleague Charalambos Tsangarides…

…include an analysis of the impacts of redistribution, as well as market inequality. They find that economic growth is lower and periods of growth are shorter in countries that have high inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient of income after taxes and transfers.43 In the same paper, the researchers show that transfers (redistributions of income from upper to lower income individuals) do not harm economic growth—at least up to a point consistent with policies in other wealthy nations. This most recent work provides strong evidence that higher levels of income inequality are detrimental to long-term economic growth and that the policies some nations have taken to redress inequality not only do not adversely impact growth but, instead, spur faster growth. Notably, this finding applies to both developed and developing countries…