#ASSA2017: Day 1 roundup

The annual meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations started today in Chicago. The conference features hundreds of sessions covering a wide variety of economics research. Interesting papers are all over the place, so below are some of the papers that caught the eyes of Equitable Growth staffers during the first day. Check back tomorrow and Sunday evening for further highlights.

Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work

Abstract: In most industries, women are not only hired at lower rates than men are, they are also promoted at lower rates. A significant portion of this promotion gap remains unexplained even after accounting for observable factors such as productivity. This paper asks whether promotion gaps emerge when employees work in groups and employers cannot perfectly observe employee effort or ability. Using data from academics’ CVs, I test whether coauthored and solo-authored publications matter differently for tenure for men and women. While solo-authored papers send a clear signal about one?s ability, coauthored papers are noisy in that they do not provide specific information about each contributor?s skills. I find that men are tenured at roughly the same rate regardless of whether they coauthor or solo-author. Women, however, become less likely to receive tenure the more they coauthor. The result is most pronounced for women coauthoring with only men and is less pronounced among women who coauthor with other women. I test several mechanisms that might explain the result and argue that it cannot be explained by sorting, women taking less credit for their work, or taste-based discrimination.

Concentrating on the Falling Labor Share

Abstract: Recent literature documents a substantial decline in labor’s share of value-added across numerous developed countries in recent decades, with the steepest falls occurring after the year 2000. But there is little consensus on the underlying causes or economic implications of this phenomenon. We provide detailed evidence and a simple conceptual model to interpret the fall in the labor share. Analyzing representative firm-level microdata, we document that the decline in the labor share is primarily a between- firm phenomenon, whereby large, capital intensive firms have increased their share of aggregate value-added. There is a rising correlation between firm market share and capital intensity in most sectors. Second, industry concentration, measured by firm market shares, has risen as well. Finally, industries that exhibited the greatest increases in concentration experienced the largest falls in labor share. We present a theory of ‘superstar firms’ where rising firm concentration and falling labor shares both stem from an increase in winner-take- all competition in product markets, possibly spurred by technological change, globalization, or deregulation.

Household Credit and Local Economic Uncertainty

Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of uncertainty on consumer credit outcomes. Individual-level data on credit-card balances and mortgages reveal strong borrower-specific heterogeneity in response to changes in an equity-based measure of county-level economic uncertainty. Low-risk borrowers reduce their credit-card balances and use of mortgage credit in response to increased localized uncertainty, while lenders expand the availability of credit to these borrowers. The opposite is obtained for high-risk borrowers. The economic magnitudes are especially large during the recent financial crisis. This evidence suggests that localized uncertainty about economic conditions might independently affect aggregate economic activity through consumer credit markets.

The Marginal Propensity to Consume Out of Liquidity: Evidence From Random Assignment of 54,522 Credit Lines

Abstract: This paper studies how consumer spending, debt and labor supply decisions respond to an exogenous shock to credit availability. I design and implement a randomized trial at a European retail bank where I deliberately vary credit card limits to 54,522 pre-existing card holders. I obtain four empirical results: (1) credit availability has a large and significant effect on spending and the use of credit; (2) this effect is not confined to a small set of credit constrained consumers; (3) increases in spending are concentrated in durables and services. (e.g., health, education); (4) credit line utilization displays mean-reverting dynamics. The findings are inconsistent with the predictions of a simple permanent income model, as well as myopic (e.g., rule-of-thumb, impatient) behavior. I then build a partial equilibrium precautionary savings model with illiquid durables, and I use the endogenous ex-post heterogeneity to quantitatively study the cross-sectional features of the responses with respect to balance sheet position and income shocks.

Gender, Marriage, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Economic Status

Abstract: We use the Statistics of Income Mobility (SOI-M) Panel, and nonparametric methods, to study the role that gender and marriage play in the intergenerational transmission of economic status. We find that, as measured by the intergenerational elasticity (IGE) of family income, the degree to which economic status is transmitted across generations does not differ much between men and women. The channels by which this transmission is accomplished do, however, vary markedly across genders. We distinguish among three different channels: the child raised in a higher-income family may have higher earnings or personal income, may have increased chances of marrying (and staying married), and may have a spouse with higher earnings or income. The first channel, as indexed by the earnings IGE, is more important for men than for women. This difference in IGEs results in large part from assortative mating and from the negative income elasticity of labor supply for married women. The other two channels are, by contrast, more important for women than for men: That is, the marriage-probability elasticity and the earnings-from-spouse elasticity (with respect to parental income) are larger for women than for men, which implies that the transmission of economic status is disproportionately “mediated” by marriage for women. Using a novel approach to decompose a nonparametrically-estimated IGE into the contributions of the three channels, we show that the direct pathway (via one’s own earnings) accounts for the bulk of the family-income IGE for men (61 percent), whereas the indirect pathway (via marriage and earnings conditional on marriage) accounts for the bulk of the IGE for women (71 percent). We conclude by discussing the tax-policy implications of our findings.

Unemployment Insurance Generosity and Aggregate Employment

Abstract: This paper examines the impact of unemployment insurance (UI) on aggregate employment by exploiting cross-state variation in the maximum benefit duration during the Great Recession. Comparing adjacent counties located in neighboring states, we find no statistically significant impact of increasing UI generosity on aggregate employment. Our point estimates are uniformly small in magnitude, and the most precise estimates rule out employment-to-population ratio reductions in excess of 0.5 percentage points from the UI extension. We show that a moderately sized fiscal multiplier can rationalize our findings with the small negative labor supply impact of UI typically found in the literature.

Wages of Power Versus Wages of Care

Abstract: Increased earnings at the high end of the labor market are sometimes attributed to rent-seeking behavior. This term is misleading for a number of reasons, among them the fact that differences in bargaining power are far more evident than differences in behavioral motivation. In this paper, I review research showing that industry and occupation-specific factors often combine in ways that enable some workers to pass on the cost of higher wages to consumers or to employers and workers in other firms. I term these “wages of power.” I apply a similar analysis to wages at the low end of the distribution, describing factors that have diminished the bargaining power of a large subset of workers, especially those engaged in low wage “caring” occupations. Many of these workers work in the public sector or for non-profit firms, feel a moral responsibility toward their clients, and produce “output” whose true value is difficult to measure. All these factors reduce their bargaining power, leaving them to subsist on the “wages of care.” I use industry and occupation-specific earnings data from the Current Population Survey to illustrate these points.

Is There a Racialized Legacy in Wealth Across Generations? Evidence from Panel Study, 1984-2013

Abstract: The wealth accumulation of parents appears to be strongly determinative of the
wealth holdings of their adult children. However, very little is known about the association of wealth that may occur across three generations of a family. This paper includes a focus on the grandparent generation in order to provide a more complete picture on
economic transfers in the extended family. We use 1984 to 2013 data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. We find that the children of white parents and grandparents may have higher wealth positions, but there is little intergenerational mobility in net wealth. And, while the children of black parents and grandparents have wealth positions that lag far behind that of white families, black children still also face very little intergenerational mobility in net wealth.

Bank Credit, Jobs, and Productivity Over the Business Cycle

Abstract: Anecdotal evidence from the Great Recession and theories from macro-finance and labor economics suggest that contractions in bank credit should lead to large and persistent contractions in employment, but existing micro evidence is mixed. We construct and analyze a novel dataset that combines detailed loan-level information on the terms of bank debt contracts with plant-level information on employment. We track the establishments of a large sample of US firms whose creditors gain rights to accelerate, restructure, or terminate a loan due to a covenant violation. Using regression discontinuity and matched-sample estimators to achieve identification, we show that loan covenant violations lead to large and lasting increases in gross job destruction, but also affect gross job creation. We examine whether this creative-destruction effect of debt financing varies systematically across sectors and over time with macroeconomic conditions. In addition, we explore the implications of the effect for net job flows and productivity, as well as for the contribution of fluctuations in credit to employment adjustments over the business cycle.

Gender, Economic and Financial Risks, and Wealth Inequality

Abstract: Researchers sometimes argue that women have less wealth than men because they are less willing to take financial risks in the stock market. Taking a broader view that includes labor market and caregiving risk exposure shows that women have more exposure than do men. This impedes savings because women will tend to focus more on the short-term. Also, they have fewer risk-reducing employer benefits. Different exposure to types of risk can explain in part women’s persistently lower wealth compared to that of men.

Demographics and Robots

Abstract: Models of the wreck of technological change link the development and adoption of technologies to changes in relative factor supplies and prices. One of the most major changes in factor supplies is underway due to the aging of the population of almost all advanced economies. We argue that this demographic transition generates a shortage of labor and should trigger the adoption of robots aimed at economizing on the expected increases in the cost of labor, especially the labor of young workers. We document that consistent with this hypothesis there is a strong cross-country correlation between adoption of reports and the aging of the population.

Should-Read: Neel Kashkari: Taylor Rule Would Have Kept Millions Out of Work

Should-Read: If the unemployment rate had averaged 1.5% points higher over the past four years, how much lower would inflation be now? That depends on your estimate of the slope of the Phillips Curve. Blanchard tells us that it is currently about 0.18 in the unemployment version of the Phillips curve. Multiplying those two gives you 0.27. You then multiply that by either 1 (if you think inflation expectations are static and anchored) or by 4 (if you think the apparent anchoring of inflation expectations is an epiphenomenon of expectational errors) to get that inflation would be between 0.3 and 1.1 percentage points lower today than its current value of 1.6–putting us between 1.3% and 0.5% per year. The Taylor rule in the 2010s would have been “not a good game”, in the words of the Fish in the Pot of Dr. Seuss’s The Cat in the Hat:

Neel Kashkari: Taylor Rule Would Have Kept Millions Out of Work: “Forcing the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to mechanically follow a rule, such as the Taylor rule…

…to set interest rates can cause tremendous harm to the economy and the American people. My staff at the Minneapolis Fed estimates that if the FOMC had followed the Taylor rule over the past five years, 2.5 million more Americans would be out of work today. That’s enough to fill the seats at all 31 NFL stadiums simultaneously, almost 6,000 more people out of work in every congressional district…

Equitable Growth’s Jobs Day Graphs: December 2016 Report Edition

Earlier this morning, The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released new data on the U.S. labor market during the month of December. Below are five graphs compiled by Equitable Growth staff highlighting important trends in the data.

1.

The share of prime-age workers with a job is at a high for this recovery, but it is still below its peak for the last 2 recoveries.

a

2.

Private sector employment has been growing consistently, but public sector employment barely back at pre-recession levels.

a

3.

Wage growth for all workers is accelerating, but growth for non-management workers isn’t picking up as much.

a

4.

Employment growth across industries has been quite varied.

a

5.

The change in and the level of the unemployment rate is quite different by education level.

a

Must- and Should-Reads: January 6, 2017

  • Josh Marshall: Chauncey Trump: “The AMA, which has been rather comically pro-Trump to date, came out today and told Republicans that they shouldn’t repeal Obamacare without a clear replacement…
  • Etienne Gagnon, Benjamin K. Johannsen, and David Lopez-Salido: Understanding the New Normal: The Role of Demographics: “Calibrating an overlapping-generation model with a rich demographic structure to observed and projected changes…

Interesting Reads:

Should-Read: Etienne Gagnon, Benjamin K. Johannsen, and David Lopez-Salido: Understanding the New Normal: The Role of Demographics

Should-Read: Etienne Gagnon, Benjamin K. Johannsen, and David Lopez-Salido: Understanding the New Normal: The Role of Demographics: “Calibrating an overlapping-generation model with a rich demographic structure to observed and projected changes…

…in U.S. population, family composition, life expectancy, and labor market activity. The model accounts for a 1–percentage-point decline in both real GDP growth and the equilibrium real interest rate since 1980—essentially all of the permanent declines in those variables according to some estimates. The model also implies that these declines were especially pronounced over the past decade or so because of demographic factors most-directly associated with the post-war baby boom and the passing of the information technology boom. Our results further suggest that real GDP growth and real interest rates will remain low in coming decades, consistent with the U.S. economy having reached a “new normal.

Must-Read: Josh Marshall: Chauncey Trump

Must-Read: Ah. Memories of 1981, and past administrations that had made big promises but had no clue…

Josh Marshall: Chauncey Trump: “The AMA, which has been rather comically pro-Trump to date, came out today and told Republicans that they shouldn’t repeal Obamacare without a clear replacement…

…Notably, even two of the most conservative health care economists at AEI, came out yesterday and said that ‘repeal and delay’ would be a disaster. The truth is that “repeal and delay” is the policy equivalent of taking off from JFK to Heathrow with 2,000 miles worth of gas and saying you’re going to figure it out en route…. This morning President-Elect Trump is out with an ambiguous and possibly meaningless (it’s sort of like Being There) series of tweets warning Republicans to “be careful” and make sure that Democrats “own” the “ObamaCare disaster.” But… only about a quarter of Americans want Obamacare repealed. A quarter!

The gist of what Republicans are saying this morning – both Trump and the GOP – is that they need to remind Americans how awful the ACA is so they’ll have some way to explain, to justify why they’re taking health care coverage from 20 to 25 million Americans, to have some explanation for the s%$&storm they’re about the fly the country’s health care system into…. They simply have no idea what to do and now they’re being taunted by Trump not to blow it and he doesn’t have any idea either. It would be funny if millions of people’s lives and well being weren’t on the line.

Musings on Worker Stickiness, Full Employment, and Productivity Growth

U S labor market tightness hiring and the decline in job switching Equitable Growth

In many businesses, the explicit or implicit human-resources policy is LHFF–last hired, first fired. That means that workers who jump from a job in one firm to a job in another purchase a greater beta with respect to the business cycle along with the higher wages, better working conditions, and more interesting responsibilities that would lead them to jump. This seems the most likely explanation for the fact that more than one-fifth of the hiring we would expect to get at the current aggregate level of unemployment relative to job openings is not there. After the catastrophic downturn of 2008-9 and the subsequent half a decade noncovery, workers’ assessments of the risks taken on in jumping firms and thus going to the back of the tenure-in-job queue are likely to be greatly elevated. Everybody knows people who lost their jobs in 2008-9 and then had the devil’s own time finding another one.

How big a drag is this on productivity growth, if it is indeed the case that diminished risk tolerance is thus affecting not only physical investment but human capital investment in diminishing workers’ willingness to “invest” in a new (and better) employer-employee match? Does this have implications for where full employment is? My first thoughts are:

  1. If workers are indeed stickier, it becomes more expensive for firms to expand employment by raising wages–you have to raise everyone’s wages and yet you attract fewer good workers from other firms. This makes the Phillips Curve even flatter in a boom, and makes inflation less of a threat, meaning we are further from full employment than we thought.

  2. Productivity growth is slower, which means that the NAIRU is higher in any model in which workers have labor market tightness-dependent expectations as to the warranted rate of real wage increase and the NAIRU equilibrates at a level at which that warranted rate is sustainable.

How big are these factors? I don’t even have a back-of-the-envelope guess as to whether they are important, or how important they are.

Nick?


Nick Bunker: Labor Market Tightness and the Decline in Job Switching: “There’s less hiring for each job opening…

…Peter Diamond… and Ayşegül Şahin…. Hires of those out of the labor force are in line with previous recoveries, and hires of those who were unemployed are slightly lower, but… hires of… already employed workers has been quite weak compared to the tightness of the labor market. Such “job switching” has been trending downward for all age groups since 2000…. Something is amiss with either the willingness of workers to switch jobs or employers’ interest in hiring already employed workers…


Peter A. Diamond and Ayşegül Şahin: Disaggregating the Matching Function: :Decompositions of aggregate hires show how the hiring process differs across different groups of workers and of firms…

…Decompositions include employment status in the previous month, age, gender and education. Another separates hiring between part-time and full-time jobs, which show different patterns in the current recovery. Shift-share analyses are done based on industry, firm size and occupation to show what part of the residual of the aggregate hiring function can be explained by the composition of vacancies…

Must- and Should-Reads: January 5, 2016


Interesting Reads:

Should-Read: Timothy Martin: The Champions of the 401(k) Lament the Revolution They Started

Should-Read: Timothy Martin: The Champions of the 401(k) Lament the Revolution They Started: “Herbert Whitehouse, formerly a Johnson & Johnson human-resources executive, was one of the first proponents of the 401(k)…

…His hope in 1981 was that the retirement-savings plan would supplement a company pension that guaranteed payouts for life. Thirty-five years later, the former Johnson & Johnson human-resources executive has misgivings about what he helped start. What Mr. Whitehouse and other proponents didn’t anticipate was that the tax-deferred savings tool would largely replace pensions as big employers looked for ways to cut expenses. Just 13% of all private-sector workers have a traditional pension, compared with 38% in 1979. “We weren’t social visionaries,” Mr. Whitehouse says. Many early backers of the 401(k) now say they have regrets about how their creation turned out….

“The great lie is that the 401(k) was capable of replacing the old system of pensions,” says former American Society of Pension Actuaries head Gerald Facciani, who helped turn back a 1986 Reagan administration push to kill the 401(k). “It was oversold.”… Financial experts recommend people amass at least eight times their annual salary to retire. All income levels are falling short. For people ages 50 to 64, the bottom half of earners have a median income of $32,000 and retirement assets of $25,000…. The middle 40% earn $97,000 and have saved $121,000, while the top 10% make $251,000 and have $450,000 socked away. And the savings gap is worsening…. More than 30 million U.S. workers don’t have access to any retirement plan because many small businesses don’t provide one….

Ms. Ghilarducci wants to ditch the 401(k) altogether. She and Blackstone Group President Tony James are recommending a mandated, government-run savings system that would be administered by the Social Security Administration and managed by investment professionals. While both are Democrats, they believe their solution has bipartisan appeal. “There are a lot of governors and mayors who are Republicans, and the first wave of the crisis will affect states and cities,” Ms. Ghilarducci says…. Others are calling for a national mandate on savings or requiring companies to automatically enroll participants at 6% of pay…