Must-Reads Found Up to Breakfast on November 23, 2015


Must-Reads Found Up to Lunchtime on November 20, 2015


Must-Reads Found Up to 7:20 AM EST on November 19, 2015

  • Prime-age female employment in the U.S. and Canada https://equitablegrowth.org/?p=16112
  • Jared Bernstein: Models of the Minimum Wage: “We can introduce some ideas… that comport a bit more with reality…. At the end of the day… when the theory doesn’t match the evidence, trust the evidence…” :: The rationale for a minimum wage is the theory that the low-wage labor market suffers market failures analogous to those of natural monopolies…
  • Miles Corak: Inequality: A Fact, an Interpretation, and a Policy Recommendation: “A common storyline…[:] inequality has not increased… there is little that can be done… effort… fighting inequality diverts attention from more pressing problems…” :: That Miles Corak… [says] ‘a common storyline’ is a measure of… right-of-center echo chamber…”
  • Isabel Sawhill: Where Have All the Workers Gone?: “Among male heads of household… between… 25-54 [nt working], 27 percent say it is because they are ill or disabled…. [But] we excluded from the sample anyone on disability…” :: I really want to see what happens to these numbers in a high-pressure low-slack economy…
  • Gabriel Zucman : GSPP Policy Research Seminar: Wealth Inequality in the United States Since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data: “The rise of wealth inequality is almost entirely due to the rise of the top 0.1% wealth share…” :: It’s all at the peak…
  • Duncan Weldon: Are the Robots Taking Enough Jobs?: “The next wave of labour-saving technology looks to be replacing human brains, rather than human brawn, and the impact could be far more wide-reaching…” :: Human smiles and human truly creative thought look to remain economically valuable. So learn how to smile!

Must-Reads Found on November 16 and November 17, 2015

  • Larry Mishel: Uber Is Not the Future of Work: “Driving mostly for supplementary income on a transitory basis…” :: I’m with Larry Mishel here: Why do people think Uber-type companies are an important deal, again? Uber, AirBNB, Criagslist… and what else?
  • Steven Pearlstein: The Value and Limits of Economic Models: “The alleged failings of economics are now widely understood…. Rodrik no doubt set out to offer an evenhanded view of modern economics, [but] in the end he winds up delivering a fairly devastating critique…” :: Let me agree with Steve Perlstein here: the economics that Dani Rodrik praises is not the strongest current, outside of our liberal-arts non-business school ivory towers, and not always even in them.
  • John Fernald: The Pre-Great-Recession Slowdown in U.S. Productivity Growth: “Counting “free” digital goods wouldn’t raise market productivity much…” :: I do not understand what John Fernald is getting at here: Who cares if it is not “market” but “home” production?
  • Mark Thoma: Where Fed’s Critics Got It Wrong in GOP Debate: “The Federal Reserve was instrumental in easing the impact of the Great Recession…” :: Critics of expansionary macro policies in a high-slack low-inflation economy have taken over Republican-Party economic policy. Can somebody please tell me what is going on?

Must-Reads Found Over the Weekend

  • Ezra Klein: Republicans Think America Is Doing Terribly, but It Isn’t: “Unemployment… 5 percent… recovery… has outpaced… other developed nations… uninsured Americans… plummeting… Obamacare… cost[s] less than expected… a second tech bubble…” :: America looks bright today primarily from the perspective of the rich, the techie, and those who have benefitted from ObamaCare’s coverage expansion. That is not most Republicans.
  • Andrew Gelman: Asking the Question Is the Most Important Step: “None of our contributions could’ve happened without the work by the original authors…” :: Something very, very peculiar is going on with middle-aged American whites in the Bush 43 and Obama years–much more so for women–and it is distinctly odd.
  • Paul Krugman: Being An Inflation Hawk Means Never Having To Say You’re Sorry: “Jeffry Lacker… just said…. Oh, wait: That’s what he said six years ago…” :: As long as reporters–even good reporters–act as stenographers, and thus neither make readers aware of their sources’ track records nor ask sources to justify why one should place confidence in their assessments, our public intellectual sphere and our dialogue will continue to be broken.


Noted for the Morning of November 13, 2015

  • Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee: Labor in the Second Machine Age: “People, unlike horses, can choose to prevent themselves from becoming economically irrelevant…” :: B&M see human sociability, extraordinary human brain reach, and the fact that we humans control our politics as forces that will prevent any robotic dystopia
  • Felix Schönbrodt: The False Discovery Rate (FDR) and the Positive Predictive Value (PPV): “The False Discovery Rate (FDR) and the Positive Predictive Value (PPV): Together with Michael Zehetleitner I developed an interactive app that computes and visualizes these numbers…” :: Everybody reading (or writing) statistical work should use this tool–it is the best quick way to understand how to assess any study given its ex-ante plausibility and its statistical power.
  • Bridget Ansel: Daniel Hamermesh… and Elena Stancanelli… [on] the tendency to work what the authors call ‘strange hours’… nights and weekends…” :: part-time, flex-time, unusual-time, and on-call work make Americans’ labor significantly more laborious than work schedules in other countries (except, I believe, Britain)
  • Ben Thompson: TensorFlow and Monetizing Intellectual Property: “Monetizing infinitely reproducible intellectual property [is] akin to selling ice to an Eskimo: it can be done, but it better be some really darn incredible ice…” :: how Alphabet’s (Google’s) strategy may suggest that our current intellectual property system and defaults may not even be to the advantage of those who hold the rights to the crown jewels of technology

Must-Reads: For the Morning of November 12, 2015

Must-Read:

  • Neel Kashkari confuses an unsustainable level of investment, a sectoral maldistribution of demand, with an unsustainable level of output…
  • Mark Thoma and company on live questions for monetary policy…
  • Noah Smith and company on the reading list for bubbles and panics…
  • And…
  • Plus…

Sorry Japan, printing money is morphine. makes u feel better but doesn't cure. BOJ Unveils Bold Bid to End Deflation http://t.co/9G9mnAOdOq

— Neel Kashkari (@neelkashkari) April 5, 2013

And in January 2014, arguing that U.S. real GDP in 2007 was unsustainably high, and thus that the economy needed a recession:

In response, Paul Krugman quotes himself from 2011: A Note on Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply: “One thing that keeps appearing in comments is the notion that…

…because we had a bubble, in which some people were borrowing too much, the economic growth of 2000-2007 wasn’t [sustainable]…. This is confusing demand with supply. We really did produce all the goods and services… because we had willing workers, a sufficient capital stock, the right technology, and so on…. Some… spending… was debt-financed, and those [particular] debtors can’t continue to spend…. But that doesn’t say… the capacity has somehow ceased to exist; it only says that… someone else has to spend instead…. Past growth wasn’t an illusion, or a fraud[, or unsustainable]; but we need policies to sustain aggregate demand. And yes, I have a model.

Paul Krugman’s model: : Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity trap: A New Model: “Debt is the crux of advanced economies’ current policy debates…

…Some argue for fiscal expansion to avoid recession and deflation. Others claim that you can’t solve a debt-created problem with more debt. This column explains the core logic of a new model by Eggertsson and Krugman in which debt shocks and policy reactions can be examined. Relying on heterogeneous agents, the model naturally produces the paradox of thrift but also finds new supply-side paradoxes, those of toil and flexibility. The model suggests that most economists have been misthinking the issues and that actual policy in the US and EU is misguided.

These are must-reads because Neel Kashkari’s views of potential output and monetary policy are, Milton Friedman would say, profoundly wrong. Friedman would say: the way you tell whether a boom is artificial and unsustainable or not is whether it generates unexpected and rising inflation. Friedman would say: When employment and production are below their sustainable supply-side trends, the right monetary policy is for the central bank to boost the money stock. Milton Friedman would say: Friedrich von Hayek was a great economist–but his greatness was definitely not in the field of business-cycle theory.

Also: Charles Steindel (2009): Implications of the Financial Crisis for Potential Growth: Past, Present, and Future; (2010): The Financial Crisis and the Measurement of Financial Sector Activity.

And, if you wish: Brad DeLong: Neel Kashkari to Replace Narayana Kocherlakota at the Minneapolis Fed?


The second must-read is one from the estimable Mark Thoma: Questions for Monetary Policy: “James Bullard, president of the St. Louis Fed…

says there are five questions for monetary policy…. “What are the chances of a hard landing in China? Have U.S. financial market stress indicators worsened substantially? Has the U.S. labor market returned to normal? What will the headline inflation rate be once the effects of the oil price shock dissipate? Will the U.S. dollar continue to gain value against rival currencies?” I would add: Will wage gains translate into inflation (or something along those lines)? Anything else?

I would add: if the Federal Reserve starts raising interest rates, will there be wage gains?


Third, Noah Smith presents his “Panics and Bubbles” reading list: “There are a lot of good non-macro and empirical papers out there on the topic of ‘Panics and Bubbles’…

…Harrison and Kreps (1978)… [on] overconfidence can lead to asset price volatility. Scheinkman & Xiong (2003) follow up. Barber and Odean (2001) provide some evidence…. Heterogeneous beliefs… a good overview by Xiong… Morris… David Romer… Barsky talking about the Japanese bubble…. Learning… Zeira…. Noise trader models… DeLong et al. (1990)… Abreu & Brunnermeier (2003). Mendel and Shleifer (2012) is yet another good one… Brunnermeier and Nagel (2004) on hedge funds and the technology bubble for some evidence…. ‘Information cascades’… Avery and Zemsky (1998), Chari and Kehoe (2003), and Park and Sabourian (2009)…. Variance bounds… other kinds of bubble tests… Refet Gurkaynak… surveys… by Brunnermeier and by Scherbina and Schlusche…. The finance theory literature has developed in parallel to the macro literature, with incomplete communication between the two…

Noah is responding to Tony Yates: If I was devising a panics and bubbles course…: “Looking through the reading list for the [proposed] PCE Manchester course…

…it seemed to miss… mainstream financial macro and microeconomics.  If I were teaching a course on panics and bubbles… I would take them through Diamond and Dybvig’s classic model of banks runs… And I would take them through the analyses of moral hazard in the provision of public deposit insurance to stop these runs [for example, see the references in Sargent’s LSE lecture, or indeed Andy Haldane’s speeches]… Geanakoplos’ work on how leverage and bouts of optimism creates booms and busts in asset prices…. Karaken and Wallace…. Angelotos and co-authors, Morris and Shin and Shleifer and Vishny… have sought to model how beliefs (eg about the value of an asset, or the likelihood of a future event) can spread and become self-fulfilling…. Roger Farmer…. I would stuff the reading list with reams of papers I hadn’t even properly read myself… Brunnermeir and Sannikov… Shin, and John Moore… Kiyotaki-Moore… Lucas, Svensson, Mehra and Prescott, Campbell and Cochrane, Epstein and Zin, Fama, Shiller…. Banking and finance in macro [due to Bernanke, Gertler, Gilchrist, Carlsrom, Fuerst, and others]…. I don’t really know why the proposal for the Manchester course on panics and bubbles was rejected.  But, if it were me, I would have ditched it too, in favour of a course that looked more like the above.

Who is responding to Claire Jones: Students’ hopes dashed over ‘crash’ course in economics teaching: “Students from the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution have had their hopes for a course on financial crashes…

…dashed after the University of Manchester refused to put it on next year’s syllabus…. The University of Manchester said: ‘We have decided not to run the Bubbles, Panics and Crashes module next academic year, but will launch other new economics-run modules to address broader areas of the economics curriculum.’


And:

Matthew Klein: The Euro Was Pointless: “It’s easy to forget now, but… many economists in the 1980s and 1990s…

…thought monetary union would encourage cross-border investment and trade by eliminating the risk premiums associated with the supposedly destabilising devaluations of the past. The net effect would be converging living standards, dampened business cycles, slower inflation, and faster productivity growth for everyone. This was a laudable goal, but unfortunately it’s not how things worked out. The policy mistakes that exacerbated the eurozone crisis, while deeply destructive, can’t be blamed. A stimulating conference recently hosted by the Centre for European Reform made it clear to us the euro had already failed to meet the expectations of its architects before the crisis.

Claudia Olivetti and M Daniele Paserman: When US intergenerational income mobility vanished: 1900-1920: “Intergenerational income mobility is currently not very high in the US…

…compared to other developed countries…. US intergenerational income equality was high in the 19th century but plummeted between 1900 and 1920. The income-mobility ladder was thus pulled up during the so-called Great Gatsby era.

Plus:

Noted for the Morning of November 10, 2015

Must- and Should-Reads:

NewImage

Might Like to Be Aware of:

Noted for Lunchtime on November 9, 2015

Must- and Should-Reads:

And Over Here:

Noted for the Morning of November 6, 2015

Must- and Should-Reads:

Might Like to Be Aware of: