Must-Read: Henry Aaron: Can Taxing the Rich Reduce Inequality? You Bet It Can!

Must-Read: Henry Aaron: Can Taxing the Rich Reduce Inequality? You Bet It Can!: “Two recently posted papers by Brookings colleagues purport to show that…

…‘even a large increase in the top marginal rate would barely reduce inequality.’  This conclusion, based on one commonly used measure of inequality, is an incomplete and misleading answer to the question posed: would a stand-alone increase in the top income tax bracket materially reduce inequality?  More importantly, it is the wrong question to pose, as a stand-alone increase in the top bracket rate would be bad tax policy that would exacerbate tax avoidance incentives.  Sensible tax policy would package that change with at least one other tax modification, and such a package would have an even more striking effect on income inequality.  In brief:

  • A stand-alone increase in the top tax bracket would be bad tax policy, but it would meaningfully increase the degree to which the tax system reduces economic inequality.  It would have this effect even though it would fall on just ½ of 1 percent of all taxpayers and barely half of their income.
  • Tax policy significantly reduces inequality.  But transfer payments and other spending reduce it far more.  In combination, taxes and public spending materially offset the inequality generated by market income.
  • The revenue from a well-crafted increase in taxes on upper-income Americans, dedicated to a prudent expansions of public spending, would go far to counter the powerful forces that have made income inequality more extreme in the United States than in any other major developed economy.”

Must-Read: Marshall Steinbaum: How Much Would Increasing Top Income Tax Rates Reduce Inequality?

Must-Read: Marshall Steinbaum: How Much Would Increasing Top Income Tax Rates Reduce Inequality?: “William Gale, Melissa Kearney, and Peter Orszag… increasing top-bracket ordinary income tax rates…

would have little impact on inequality…. There are two key reasons why [their] tax scenarios do not affect [their measure of] inequality very much. First of all, the rich earn a great deal of their income in categories other than “ordinary income,” to which these tax rates apply…. The other reason… is that GKO measure inequality by the Gini Coefficient. But the scenarios only affect individuals comfortably within the top 1% of the income distribution…. The Gini Coefficient is insensitive to measuring inequality in that group….. [But] the reduction in the top 1% income share as a result of the GKO scenario is just under 20% of the total increase in inequality over the whole period the CBO analyzes…