Must-Read: Maury Obstfeld: Evolution Not Revolution: Rethinking Policy at the IMF

Must-Read: Maurice Obstfeld: Evolution Not Revolution: Rethinking Policy at the IMF: “I would describe the process as evolution, not revolution…

…The Fund has long tried to build on its experiences in the field and on new research to improve its effectiveness in economic surveillance, technical assistance, and crisis response. It’s fair to say that the shock of the global financial crisis led to a broad rethink of macroeconomic and financial policy in the global academic and policy community. The Fund has been part of that, but, given the impacts of our decisions on member countries and the global economic system, we view it as especially important for us constantly to re-evaluate our thinking in light of new evidence. That process has not fundamentally changed the core of our approach, which is based on open and competitive markets, robust macro policy frameworks, financial stability, and strong institutions. But it has added important insights about how best to achieve those results in a sustainable way….

We are in favor of fiscal policies that support growth and equity over the long term. What those policies will be can differ from country to country and from situation to situation. Governments simply have to live within their means on a long-term basis, or face some form of debt default, which normally is quite costly for citizens, and especially the poorest. This is a fact, not an ideological position. Our job is to advise how governments can best manage their fiscal policies so as to avoid bad outcomes. Sometimes, this requires us to recognize situations in which excessive budget cutting can be counterproductive to growth, equity, and even fiscal sustainability goals….

Countries need credible medium-term fiscal frameworks that leave markets confident the public debt can be repaid without very high inflation. Countries with such frameworks will typically have room to soften economic slumps through fiscal means, including automatic stabilizers…. There are limits to the pain economies can or should sustain, so in especially difficult cases we recommend debt re-profiling or debt reduction, which require creditors to bear part of the cost of adjustment. That is the approach we are currently recommending for Greece…

Must-Read: Maury Obstfeld: Deflation Risks May Warrant Radical New Central-Bank Thinking

Must-Read: The asymmetry created by the zero lower bound on short-term safe nominal interest rates is not a difficult concept to grasp. The resulting optionality preserved by aiming at policies that overshoot on employment, growth, and inflation, and then dialing-back if necessary, is both important and relatively simple. Yet since the end of 2008, at every stage, this principle has been grossly neglected by economic policymakers. Hank Paulson was the last person to understand–that is why he went for $700 billion for the TARP even though he (wrongly) thought he would not need it.

Maury understands:

Maury Obstfeld: Deflation Risks May Warrant Radical New Central-Bank Thinking: “I worry about deflation globally…

…It may be time to start thinking outside the box…. You can always, always deal with high inflation… [but] at the zero lower bound, our options are much more limited. In order to bring inflation expectations firmly back to 2% in the advanced countries, where we’d like to see it, it’s probably going to be necessary to have some overshooting of the 2% level, or at least to entertain that as a possibility…