Must-Read: Jack Ayer: Khlopotat’

Must-Read: On central planning, or perhaps simply on bureaucracy:

Jack Ayer: Khlopotat’: “Another Teffi, except this is actually a translator’s note on what might be the perfect Russianism:

Here we are translating khlopotat’, a common Russian word for which there is no English equivalent. Elsewhere, in passages where Teffi draws less attention to this verb, we have translated it in different ways: ‘apply for,’ ‘try to obtain,’ ‘procure,’ etc. In ‘Moscow: the Last Days,’ an article she published in Kiev in October 1918, Teffi explains the word: ‘Incidentally, there is no equivalent to this idiotic term khlopotat’ in any other language in the world. A foreigner will say, ‘I’ll go and get the documents.’ A Russian, ‘I must hurry and start to khlopotat’ with regard to the documents.’ The foreigner will go to the appropriate institution and obtain what he needs. The Russian will go to three people he knows for advice, to two more who can ‘pull strings’, then to the institution—but it’ll be the wrong one—then to the right institution—but he’ll keep on knocking at the wrong doors until it’s too late. Then he’ll start everything all over again and, when he’s finally brought everything to a conclusion, he’ll leave the documents in a cab. This whole process is what is described by the word khlopotat’. Such work, if carried out on behalf of a third party, is highly valued and well paid’ (Teffi v strane vospominanii, pp. 167–70).’

from ‘Memories: From Moscow to the Black Sea (New York Review Books Classics)’ by Teffi, Edythe Haber, Robert Chandler, Anne Marie Jackson, Irina Steinberg.

Must-read: Spencer Headworth and Jeremy Freese: “Credential Privilege or Cumulative Advantage?: Prestige, Productivity, and Placement in the Academic Sociology Job Market”

Must-Read: Cumulative advantage plus bureaucratic formally-meritocratic procedures that rely on “objective” indicators of achievement plus a degree of signaling but risk aversion do wind up producing something that looks a lot like a caste system. Thus I think Headworth and Freese misinterpret what their own results are really saying to them:

Spencer Headworth and Jeremy Freese: Credential Privilege or Cumulative Advantage?: Prestige, Productivity, and Placement in the Academic Sociology Job Market: “We examine different predictors of placement in research-oriented, tenure-track academic sociology jobs…

…The enormous relationship between PhD institution and job placement that has, in part, prompted a popular metaphor that academic job allocation processes are like a caste system. Yet we also find comparable relationships between PhD program and both graduate student publishing and awards. Overall, we find results more consistent with PhD prestige operating indirectly through mediating achievements or as a quality signal than as a ‘pure prestige’ effect. We suggest sociologists think of stratification in their profession as not requiring exceptionalist historical metaphors, but rather as involving the same ordinary but powerful processes of cumulative advantage that pervade contemporary life.

Must-read: Richard Mayhew: “School Lunches and Medicaid: a BFD”

Must-Read: Richard Mayhew: School Lunches and Medicaid: a BFD: “[‘Interested State agencies that administer the National School Lunch Program (NSLP)…

…can now use Medicaid data to certify students for free and reduced priced lunches.’] Kids who have enough to eat and are not worried about having enough to eat have two significant advantages over kids who don’t have enough to eat and have to worry about that. The first is simple, they have more energy to spend on high intensity activities of play and learning (speaking as a dad of a first grader, those two things should be very close to the same a good chunk of the time). Secondly and slightly more subtly, kids who are not worried about their next meal are able to devote high complexity cognitive processes to other things. Kids (and adults) have a finite amount of brain horsepower available at any given time. Not worrying about food frees up capacity for other things. Kids who are worried about food are devoting a limited brain budget to that task and not to other things.

The free and reduced price school lunch program in most districts… has a significant amount of paperwork and potential stigma…. People who… have signed up for Medicaid or CHIP… have routine income verification processes…. Allowing states to use pre-exisiting data to pre-qualify kids for free or reduced price school lunches will help a few more kids get a quality daily meal or two in their stomachs which should their well being in addition to school performance. It is also an example of the government working to actively improve peoples’ lives while streamlining the interaction. If we could only make it mandatory that states use Medicaid or SNAP eligiblity data to drive the full array of income qualified social services instead of silo-ing different categories of assistance, so duplication and administrative burden increases wasted costs without providing qualified individuals the services and assistance that they need.