Should-Read: Greg Leiserson: The Tax Foundation’s treatment of the estate tax in its macroeconomic model

Should-Read: Greg Leiserson looks to me to be correct here: the structure of the Tax Foundation’s model is inconsistent. Or, rather, the only consistency is: “what assumption about this piece will produce a result more to the liking of our Republican political masters?”: Greg Leiserson: The Tax Foundation’s treatment of the estate tax in its macroeconomic model: “Notably, this justification for the assumption that the marginal investor is domestic even as the rate of return is fixed…

…because the United States is appropriately modeled as a small open economy—appears to exist entirely outside its model. As best I can determine… the Tax Foundation model itself appears to include no explicit model of markets in government debt (or other low-risk assets), the composition of savers’ portfolios, and the allocation of assets between domestic and foreign investors. Thus, while the Tax Foundation asserts that a difference in risk tolerance between domestic and foreign investors justifies its modeling assumptions, it is simply impossible to consider these issues…

Topics

Connect with us!

Explore the Equitable Growth network of experts around the country and get answers to today's most pressing questions!

Get in Touch