Evening Must-Read: Lemin Wu: If Not Malthusian, Then Why?

Problems of measuring living standards properly go way, way, way back, as Lemin Wu demonstrates:

Lemin Wu: If Not Malthusian, Then Why?: “The pre-industrial stagnation of living standards…

…Technological improvement in luxury production… faster than improvement in subsistence production, would have kept living standards growing…. [There is] a puzzle of balanced growth between the luxury sector and the subsistence sector…. [The hypothesis is of] group selection in the form of biased migration. A tiny bit of bias in migration can suppress a strong tendency of growth. The theory reexplains the Malthusian trap and the prosperity of ancient market economies such as Rome and Song…”

Thomas Malthus (1809): “All other arguments are of slight and subordinate consideration in comparison of this. I see no way by which man can escape from the weight of this law which pervades all animated nature…”

Lionel Robbins (1998): “But in economics, the admission that mankind need not live at the margin of subsistence […] meant that, the very long run limit of wages was not physiological subsistence, it was psychological subsistence—a much more complicated and difficult matter to formulate exactly…”

February 26, 2015

Connect with us!

Explore the Equitable Growth network of experts around the country and get answers to today's most pressing questions!

Get in Touch