Afternoon Must-Read; Dylan Matthews: Greg Mankiw’s Worst Argument Against Piketty Yet

Economics professor vs. Social Studies major. The result is as expected:

Dylan Matthews:
Greg Mankiw’s Worst Argument Against Piketty Yet:
“Greg Mankiw has been a vocal critic…

…of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century since its release…. He challenges Piketty’s claim that wealth inequality threatens democracy….

A final possibility is that wealth inequality is somehow a threat to democracy. Piketty alludes to this worry throughout his book. I am less concerned. The wealthy includes supporters of both the right (the Koch brothers, Sheldon Adelson) and the left (George Soros, Tom Steyer), and despite high levels of inequality, in 2008 and 2012 the United States managed to elect a left-leaning president committed to increasing taxes on the rich. The fathers of American democracy, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and James Madison, were very rich men. With estimated net worth (in today’s dollars) ranging from $20 million to $500 million, they were likely all in the top 0.1 percent of the wealth distribution, demonstrating that the accumulation of capital is perfectly compatible with democratic values. Yet, to the extent that wealth inequality undermines political ideals, reform of the electoral system is a better solution than a growth-depressing tax on capital…

Contra Mankiw, the Founding Fathers are a vivid illustration of Piketty’s point, not a refutation of it. The United States in the 1780s was controlled by economic elites that were universally white and male and owned considerable capital, much of it… slaves…. The slave-holding class was able to translate its wealth into political influence, enough to maintain the institution for 77 years after the Constitution was ratified… a system that was, by any reasonable definition, not a democracy…. It’d be preposterous to argue that the staggering wealth gap between white men and women and African-Americans played no role in the latter’s systematic exclusion from political life for most of American history. There was enormous wealth inequality, and the result was a massive betrayal of democratic values in favor of an apartheid system. This is exactly the kind of thing Piketty is concerned about.

I would challenge the inclusion of John Adams in the top 0.1%.

And it is remarkable how the African-American population is simply… invisible to Mankiw, is the only thing one can say…

January 2, 2015

Connect with us!

Explore the Equitable Growth network of experts around the country and get answers to today's most pressing questions!

Get in Touch